Абстракт
Цель исследования - оценить демографические характеристики, диагностические подходы, основные жалобы при обращении и процессы принятия клинических решений у детей, обращающихся в амбулаторное отделение детской хирургии с урологическими жалобами. В данное ретроспективное исследование были включены 156 детей, обратившихся с урологическими жалобами. Пациенты с неурологическими кодами ICD-10, а также пациенты, родители или законные представители, которых отказались от участия, были исключены из исследования. Были проанализированы данные о возрасте, поле, жалобах при обращении, диагнозах по ICD-10, результатах лабораторных исследований, интервалах наблюдения и окончательных клинических решениях. Статистический анализ включал U-критерий Манна–Уитни, критерий Краскела–Уоллиса, критерий χ², точный критерий Фишера и мультиномиальную логистическую регрессию. Анализ проводился с использованием статистического программного пакета jamovi версии 2.7.32.0. Исследование было проведено в соответствии с принципами Хельсинкской декларации; от родителей или законных представителей было получено информированное согласие. Из 156 пациентов 115 (73,7%) были мальчиками и 41 (26,3%) — девочками. Медианный возраст при обращении был значительно ниже у мальчиков (3 года, межквартильный диапазон [IQR] 2–5 лет), чем у девочек (8 лет, IQR 5–12 лет) (p < 0,001). Наиболее часто встречающимися диагнозами были N39.0 (36,5%), N39.9 (31,4%) и R39.8 (14,7%). Жалобы при обращении статистически значимо различались в зависимости от пола (p < 0,001), главным образом вследствие проблем, связанных с половым членом и обрезанием у мальчиков. Дизурия встречалась с одинаковой частотой у представителей обоих полов. Статистически значимой связи между клиническими решениями и первоначальным диагнозом по ICD-10 выявлено не было (p = 0,756). Мультиномиальная логистическая регрессия показала, что результаты лабораторных исследований были более тесно связаны с последующими решениями по ведению пациентов, чем возраст или пол. Среди обращений детей с урологическими жалобами преобладают мальчики, причём они обращаются за медицинской помощью в более раннем возрасте, чем девочки. Первоначальные амбулаторные диагнозы в значительной степени основываются на симптомах и имеют неспецифический характер. По-видимому, клинические решения в большей степени определяются результатами диагностических исследований и индивидуальным течением заболевания, чем предварительным диагностическим кодом. Использование стратегий обследования с учётом возраста и пола может повысить эффективность амбулаторной урологической помощи детям.
Сопроводительное письмо
Pediatric urology encompasses disorders of the urinary tract and genital organs from infancy through adolescence. These conditions range from urinary tract infections to congenital genital anomalies and may influence both physical health and psychosocial development. Common problems encountered in this age group include urinary tract infections, hypospadias, phimosis, and enuresis. Early recognition and appropriate management of urinary tract infection are essential to prevent complications such as pyelonephritis (1). Urinary tract infections may also occur frequently in children without underlying bladder dysfunction (1-3).
The literature consistently indicates that the pattern of urological complaints in children varies according to age and sex. Congenital anomalies predominate in infancy and early childhood, whereas infectious and functional disorders become more prominent during school age. The epidemiological profile of adolescents may further differ from that of younger children (4). Functional conditions such as nocturnal enuresis affect 15–20% of children around the age of five and decline progressively with advancing age.
Understanding the distribution of these problems by age and sex is important because it directly influences diagnostic pathways and treatment strategies. Epidemiological evaluations also contribute to assessing disease burden and comparing the cost-effectiveness of different management approaches (5). In addition, a systematic initial evaluation by the physician facilitates appropriate multidisciplinary involvement when required (5). The epidemiology of pediatric urological disorders is further shaped by geographical and socioeconomic factors. In the present study, we analyzed data from children presenting to a pediatric surgery outpatient clinic with urological complaints. We aimed to characterize the demographic profile, identify the ICD-10 diagnoses assigned at the first visit, and examine the relationships between age, sex, presenting complaints, and subsequent clinical decisions. We examined age differences by sex and the patterns of initial evaluation that influence diagnostic and therapeutic pathways.
METHODS This retrospective study was conducted on pediatric patients who presented to the pediatric surgery outpatient clinic with urological complaints. Medical records of all children evaluated during the study period were reviewed. Patients were included if their primary ICD-10 diagnosis was classified as urological. Exclusion criteria were; (1) an ICD-10 code that was not related to the urinary or genital system and (2) refusal of the family to provide informed consent for the use of anonymized clinical data.
The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from the parents or legal guardians of all participating children prior to data extraction and analysis. Ethically, patient identities were anonymized. Ethical approval numbered GOKAEK-2414_2024.12.04_256 was obtained from the University Hospital Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee.
Demographic data (age at admission and sex), presenting complaints, ICD-10 diagnoses (primary and subsequent), laboratory and imaging investigations ordered, outpatient follow-up intervals, and final clinical decisions (observation/normal, follow-up, prescription, circumcision, antireflux treatment, or surgical recommendation) were extracted from the electronic medical records. Continuous variables were summarized as median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages.
Comparisons of continuous variables between two independent groups were performed with the Mann–Whitney U test. Comparisons across more than two groups were performed with the Kruskal–Wallis test. Associations between categorical variables were assessed with the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test (with Monte Carlo simulation when appropriate). Multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent effects of age, sex, and laboratory testing on final clinical decisions, with “normal/observation” serving as the reference category. Model fit was assessed by deviance, Akaike information criterion (AIC), and McFadden’s pseudo-R². A two-sided p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the jamovi 2.7.32.0 package.
RESULTS A total of 156 children who presented to the pediatric surgery outpatient clinic with urological complaints were included in the analysis. Of these, 115 (73.7%) were male and 41 (26.3%) were female. The median admission age was 3 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–5) among males and 8 years (IQR: 5–12) among females (Table 1). Female patients were significantly older than male patients (Mann–Whitney U = 1064, p < 0.001). The most frequent ICD-10 diagnoses were N39.0 (urinary tract infection) and N39.9 (disorder of urinary system, unspecified). N39.0 accounted for 40 (35%) of male and 17 (41%) of female diagnoses, while N39.9 accounted for 29 (25%) of male and 20 (49%) of female diagnoses. Other diagnoses were distributed at low frequencies across both sexes (Table 1). The official designations and clinical explanations of the principal ICD-10 codes encountered in the cohort are summarized in Table 2. Most presentations clustered under symptomatic codes (particularly R39.8 and related R-group codes) rather than structural congenital anomalies (Q-group codes) Statistical evaluation of the relationships among sex, age, and diagnosis is presented in Table 3. No significant association was found between sex and diagnostic category (χ² = 25.0, df = 19, p = 0.162; Fisher’s exact test p = 0.085). Admission age differed markedly by sex (Mann–Whitney U = 1064, p < 0.001) but showed only a borderline, non-significant trend across diagnostic groups (Kruskal–Wallis χ² = 28.3, df = 19, p = 0.078). Median age was significantly higher in girls than in boys (Mann–Whitney U = 1064, p < 0.001). Diagnostic profiles did not differ significantly by sex (Fisher’s exact p = 0.085). Age distribution across ICD-10 categories was likewise non-significant (Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.078). Presenting complaints stratified by sex are shown in Table 4. Overall complaint distribution differed highly significantly between sexes (Fisher’s exact test, p < 0.001). External genitalia-related complaints accounted for 47 (40.9%) of male presentations and were absent among females. Dysuria occurred at nearly identical frequencies in both sexes (24.3% of males, 24.4% of females). Systemic or general complaints were substantially more common among girls (41.5%).
The temporal relationship between outpatient follow-up intervals and the assignment of second (Diagnosis 2) and third (Diagnosis 3) diagnoses is summarized in Table 5. Both Diagnosis 2 (χ² = 391, df = 256, p < 0.001) and Diagnosis 3 (χ² = 356, df = 84, p < 0.001) were strongly associated with follow-up timing. Most patients required neither a second (83.9%, n = 131) nor a third (87.1%, n = 136) diagnostic code. Same-day encounters predominantly retained the original symptomatic codes, whereas longer follow-up intervals occasionally incorporated functional or chronic codes (e.g., constipation-related K59). A multinomial logistic regression model was constructed to examine factors associated with final clinical decisions (operation recommendation, reflux treatment, circumcision, follow-up, or prescription), using “normal/observation” as the reference category. Model-fit indices and omnibus tests are shown in Table 6. The model demonstrated moderate explanatory power (McFadden pseudo-R² = 0.176, deviance = 467.00). Omnibus likelihood-ratio tests indicated that sex (p = 0.344), admission age (p = 0.137), and laboratory-test category (p = 0.808) did not exert statistically significant independent main effects on final decisions. Parameter estimates for selected contrasts are presented in Table 7. Relative to children managed expectantly, those who underwent ultrasonography alone had significantly higher odds of receiving an operation recommendation (OR = 1.28, p < 0.001). Children who received combined laboratory testing (ultrasonography plus urine analysis) were substantially less likely to be assigned to simple follow-up only (OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.01–0.55, p = 0.009). Neither age nor sex independently predicted operation, circumcision, follow-up, or prescription decisions after adjustment (p > 0.05 for all relevant contrasts). Finally, the relationship between principal diagnostic categories and ultimate clinical disposition is displayed in Table 8. The three most frequent diagnoses—N39.0 (36.5%), N39.9 (31.4%), and R39.8 (14.7%)—showed comparable rates of active treatment recommendation (53–65%). No statistically significant association was observed between diagnostic group and clinical decision (Fisher’s exact p = 0.756). Decisions appeared to be driven more by individual clinical trajectory than by the specific ICD-10 label assigned at presentation. Overall, the clinical decision-making process in this outpatient urological cohort was only weakly related to demographic variables or to the initial ICD-10 label and was more closely linked to the results of targeted laboratory investigations and to the longitudinal course of symptoms.
DISCUSSION Our findings highlight important demographic and clinical patterns in children presenting with urological complaints to a pediatric surgery outpatient clinic. Males constituted the clear majority (73.7%), and they presented at a significantly younger age than females (median 3 years versus 8 years, p < 0.001). This age difference is consistent with the literature, in which congenital anomalies such as hypospadias and phimosis are typically diagnosed in infancy and early childhood among boys, whereas urinary tract infections become more prominent in girls during school age (3). Similar trends have been reported in studies from our country, where urinary tract infections are more common in boys during infancy but increase substantially in girls at school age.
The most frequently assigned ICD-10 codes were non-specific: N39.0 (urinary tract infection), N39.9 (disorder of the urinary system, unspecified), and R39.8 (other symptoms and signs involving the urinary system). Together, these three codes accounted for most primary diagnoses. This pattern indicates that the initial outpatient evaluation is largely symptom-oriented rather than based on a definitive structural diagnosis. Minor urinary symptoms are known to occur frequently even in otherwise healthy individuals (6). As noted by Kyrklund and colleagues, such symptoms are relatively uncommon in carefully selected healthy children aged 4–7 and 8–12 years, which may help distinguish pathological from functional complaints (6).
A highly significant difference was observed in the distribution of presenting complaints according to sex (p < 0.001). Penile and circumcision-related problems accounted for approximately 41% of male presentations. In contrast, dysuria occurred at nearly identical rates in both sexes (approximately 24%). These findings align with previous observations that anatomical factors (such as a shorter urethra) increase the risk of infection in girls, while local genital problems predominate in boys (3). Interestingly, the initial ICD-10 diagnosis showed no statistically significant association with the final clinical decision (follow-up, observation, or active treatment recommendation; p = 0.756). Multinomial logistic regression further demonstrated that age and sex did not independently predict most clinical decisions once laboratory investigations were considered. Ordering ultrasonography or combined laboratory tests was more strongly associated with the subsequent management pathway. This suggests that, in the outpatient setting, the clinician’s decision is driven more by the results of targeted investigations and the individual clinical course than by the preliminary diagnostic code assigned at the first visit. The literature emphasizes that recurrent urinary tract infections may lead to bladder dysfunction and that symptoms such as urgency, daytime incontinence, and enuresis require careful follow-up because they may persist into adulthood (2,3,8). Upper and lower urinary tract infections have been reported to be more common in girls across age groups, while incontinence and enuresis tend to be more frequent in younger children (2). Our data are consistent with these patterns, although the predominance of non-specific coding limited more granular analysis of functional disorders.
Taken together, the results support the multidisciplinary nature of pediatric urology and underline the value of a structured initial evaluation. Early genital examination and screening for congenital anomalies remain particularly relevant in young boys, whereas infection prevention strategies and assessment for bladder dysfunction are more pertinent in school-age girls. In recent years, technological advances have further increased the importance of timely diagnosis, as minimally invasive and endourological techniques now allow earlier intervention and may help prevent long-term complications (9).
Limitations The main limitation of the study is the relatively modest sample size (n = 156), which restricts the generalizability of the findings. Because the data were obtained from a single outpatient clinic, regional bias cannot be excluded. The retrospective design limits causal inference. In addition, the text-based nature of presenting complaints may have introduced categorization inaccuracies. Future prospective, multicenter studies with larger cohorts would help validate these patterns and allow more detailed analysis of functional and structural subgroups.
CONCLUSION This retrospective study demonstrated that boys constitute most children presenting with urological complaints to a pediatric surgery outpatient clinic and that they present at a significantly younger age than girls. The most frequently assigned diagnoses were non-specific codes (N39.0, N39.9, and R39.8), reflecting a predominantly symptom-based approach at the first visit. Presenting complaints differed markedly by sex, mainly because of penile and circumcision-related problems in boys, whereas clinical decisions were more closely related to laboratory investigations and individual clinical course than to the initial diagnostic label. These findings reinforce the importance of age- and sex-sensitive evaluation pathways. Larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm the observed patterns and to refine outpatient referral and management strategies in pediatric urology.
Фигуры
Ключевые слова
Ссылки
1.Shaikh N, Morone NE, Bost JE, Farrell MH. Prevalence of urinary tract infection in childhood: a meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008 Apr;27(4):302-8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31815e4122. PMID: 18316994.
2.Salö M, Nejstgaard MC, Hambraeus M, Graneli C, Börjesson A, Hagelsteen K, Stenström P. Sex and age differences in lower urinary tract dysfunction in healthy children. Acta Paediatr. 2021 Sep;110(9):2618-2626. doi: 10.1111/apa.15959. Epub 2021 Jun 30. PMID: 34050977.
3.Hellström A, Hanson E, Hansson S, Hjälmås K, Jodal U. Association between urinary symptoms at 7 years old and previous urinary tract infection. Arch Dis Child. 1991 Feb;66(2):232-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.2.232. PMID: 2001110; PMCID: PMC1792822.
4.Jesus LE, Dekermacher S, Frota J, Bragança JJ, Anderson KM. Adolescents and adults in pediatric urology clinics. J Pediatr Urol. 2014 Jun;10(3):408-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.06.009. Epub 2013 Jul 21. PMID: 23880326.
5.Miller DC, Saigal CS, Litwin MS. The demographic burden of urologic diseases in America. Urol Clin North Am. 2009 Feb;36(1):11-27, v. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2008.08.004. PMID: 19038632; PMCID: PMC2614213.
6.Kyrklund K, Taskinen S, Rintala RJ, Pakarinen MP. Lower urinary tract symptoms from childhood to adulthood: a population based study of 594 Finnish individuals 4 to 26 years old. J Urol. 2012 Aug;188(2):588-93. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.016. Epub 2012 Jun 15. PMID: 22704114.
7.Vaz GT, Vasconcelos MM, Oliveira EA, Ferreira AL, Magalhães PG, Silva FM, Lima EM. Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in school-age children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012 Apr;27(4):597-603. doi: 10.1007/s00467-011-2028-1. Epub 2011 Oct 4. PMID: 21969094.
8.Akil IO, Ozmen D, Cetinkaya AC. Prevalence of urinary incontinence and lower urinary tract symptoms in school-age children. Urol J. 2014 Jul 8;11(3):1602-8. PMID: 25015605.
9.Cobellis G. Urology in Pediatrics. Children (Basel). 2022 Mar 2;9(3):337. doi: 10.3390/children9030337. PMID: 35327709; PMCID: PMC8947070.
О статье:
История публикации
Опубликовано: 13.Oct.2026
Авторское право
© 2022-2025. Azerbaijan Medical University. E-Journal is published by "Uptodate in Medicine" health sciences publishing. All rights reserved.Связанные статьи
Связанные статьи не найдены
Просмотрено: 13


